My scale has an option for calibration that demands putting on a scale of declared weight from 1000 g down to 50 g in decrements of 50 g. After some calculations I decided that 100 g weight in coins is the best choice. You will soon understand why.

Using this simple brute-force formula in Mathematica I calculated all possible solutions for various weights:

Reduce[e2*8.5 + e1*7.5 + c50*7.8 + c20*5.74 + c10*4.1 +

c5*3.92 + c2*3.06 + c1*2.3 == 100 && e2 >= 0 && e1 >= 0 &&

c50 >= 0 && c20 >= 0 && c10 >= 0 && c5 >= 0 && c2 >= 0 &&

c1 >= 0, {e2, e1, c50, c20, c10, c5, c2, c1}, Integers]

total weight | possible solutions | min. number of coins | max. number of coins | min. value of coins | max. value of coins |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

50 g | 115 | 6 | 20 | 0.29 € | 11.00 € |

100 g | 4674 | 12 | 41 | 0.57 € | 22.00 € |

150 g | 52858 | 18 | 62 | 0.85 € | 33.00 € |

200 g | 318476 | 24 | 83 | 0.97 € | 44.00 € |

Note that the solution with minimum coins always has the maximum value, and vice versa.

As you can see the number of solutions increases greatly with each weight. It roughly follows an exponential power function

^{[1]}shown on the next plot.

Log-plot of possible solutions vs. total weight. |

Here are all of the solutions for 100 g total weight. You can download it and import in Excel or Mathematica or some other program if you want to play with it.

The solution with fewest coins and maxium value is the following:

10 × 2 €

2 × 1 €

Totaling 12 coins worth 22 €.

The solution with most coins and minimum value is the following:

1 × 10 c

1 × 5 c

3 × 2 c

36 × 1 c

Totaling 41 coins worth just 0.57 €.

A comparison of coin weights by their values. |

A comparison of total coins used in all solutions by their values. |

You can clearly see the connection between the above plots. The lighter the coin, the more it will be used. No surprises here.

Also interesting are the distributions of the solutions.

And here is my digital scale, freshly calibrated.

Also interesting are the distributions of the solutions.

Distribution of solutions by total number of coins used. It almost follows the normal distribution, but there is an unexplained shift of the peak to the left of the calculated distribution. |

Distribution of solutions by total value of the solution. This one follows a Chi-square distribution instead of the normal distribution. Note that I've rounded the values to 10 cents for a better representation. The plot with original values can be seen here. |

The combination is 11 × 10 c; 6 × 5 c; 8 × 2 c; 3 × 1c - the only one possible with the change from my wallet.

I hope you will find this useful and will calibrate your scales if you haven't already. And remember, it's best to use new coins straight from a bank. Dirt, oxides and scratches on the coins will cause an inaccurate calibration, especially with a more sensitive scale.

[1] The name is my own invention for functions of the type

*y = a^x^b*since I couldn't find any information of this type of functions on the internet.

I love your blog!

ReplyDeleteProbably your gonna like mine too!

Hehe, interesting way of calibration. Cool pastebin link.

ReplyDelete